14 May 2020 The contribution of hunters to monitoring biodiversity in Europe
Monitoring biodiversity in Europe is usually very costly and time consuming and often resources from governments are limited. A new scientific study published in April 2020 highlights the unique and important niche that hunters fill in the monitoring of biodiversity across Europe. There are mainly four aspects that makes the work and engagement of hunters so valuable for management authorities and researchers:
- During their hunting activity and the management of their hunting grounds, hunters collect diverse data on biodiversity characteristics such as species populations, species traits, genetic composition, or community composition. Since hunting grounds cover most of the European countryside, hunters ensure the collection of data over an adequate and large-scale resolution.
- Hunting data can provide time-series that cover different seasons or range even over several decades which make these datasets useful for monitoring changes in biodiversity and ecosystems.
- Hunters collect characteristics mainly on huntable species and those species that are easy to identify with high precision. Species misidentification or other uncertainties are therefore less of an issue when making usage of hunters’ data.
- Through the delivery of biological samples (e.g. jaw bones, wings, tissues) from harvested animals, hunters provide data on demographics and health of animals which would have been otherwise not obtainable.
A key point of our study is that collaborations between hunters and scientists are fruitful and should be considered a standard partnership for biodiversity conservation. A result of this is that many of the game species are among the best studied wildlife species we have in Europe - says the lead author, Benjamin Cretois, based at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
In this study, Cretois and his colleagues investigated hunters’ contribution to the monitoring of five broad functional species groups: “ungulates”, “large carnivores”, “waterfowl”, “other birds” and “small game”. The results indicate that in 32 out of the 36 European counties, hunter-based monitoring of at least one species group is in place which underlines the important role of hunters in the monitoring process of Europe’s biodiversity (see figure 1). A role that is now acknowledged by the scientific community.
We think that our review has only revealed the tip of the iceberg because a lot of the monitoring activity conducted by hunters is not readily accessible to scientists. We hope that this study can stimulate a broader engagement between hunters and researchers, bringing benefits to both! - says senior scientist and co-author John Linnell at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.
In 2019, FACE produced a Biodiversity Manifesto report which focused on the contribution of hunters to the monitoring of biodiversity (see BDM 2018). With over 300 projects, this report successfully showed hunters’ engagement for biodiversity conservation via research/monitoring and we are happy to see that is report is now complemented and supported by an article in a scientific journal. This year, FACE published a new BDM report, which shows that 52% of the 430 initiatives undertaken by hunters for nature conservation focused on research/monitoring.
Silvio SpanòPosted at 18:33h, 21 May
Congratulations on the important job. However, I would like to underline the little interest dedicated to the Beccaccia species which since about 1970 has involved working groups and important hunting associations in almost all EU and non-EU countries of the Western Palearctic for field data collection and specialized research (satellite radiotracking, dosage of the Deuterium).
Examples: Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group (IWRB-WI / IUCN), FANBPO, Réseau Bécasse (Obf).
Best Regards Prof. Silvio Spanò – Honorary President of Union for Woodcock-Italy)